Cruncher Block

Cruncher Block
Evolution of of the first atom?

As organic matter is made up of atoms then the principle of evolution- to be intellectually consistent and sustain credibility, would need to offer a plausible explanation as to what was the prevailing environment at the time that compelled what can only retrospectively described as the first subatomic particle, to develop into (along with the new actualities of other necessary particles and fundamental forces along the way) into that most fundamental Building Block of the human body?
(and whatever particles the Collider/Cruncher may, or may, not make newly visible.)

I don’t believe your right – there’s no reason why we can’t have very credible answers to explain what we see right now even though we can’t explain the beginnings. And there’s no reason to suppose that a certain quantity of energy/mass hasn’t always existed – never created, never ending – just here going through continual change.

The first atoms in our present universe arose after the big bang when the expansion of energy, space, and time cooled down enough for quarks and electrons to form. It was another 13+ billion years before humans showed up under completely different circumstances, so these events aren’t really connected.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.