John Hancock

John Hancock

Lego 21001 John Hancock Center (2008) Classic Vintage $0.99

Boston’s Tallest Buildings

Boston is an ultramodern city that boasts of some of the tallest buildings in United States. Boston is New England’s largest and most important city. You will come across some of the tallest skyscrapers that will mesmerize and enchant your senses. So, be ready to visit Boston and embrace its’ beautiful skyscrapers.

The city is the site of 16 skyscrapers that rise at least 500 feet (152 m) in height, more than any other city in New England. Based on existing and under-construction buildings over 500 feet (152 m) tall), the skyline of Boston is ranked second in the Northeast (after New York City) and tenth in the United States.

The Hancock Tower, popularly known as the John Hancock tower is the tallest structure in the city which was built in 1976, consists of 60 floors and rises 790 feet high. The second-tallest building in Boston is the Prudential Tower, which is 749 feet (228 m) high. However, besides these two, there are other tall structures in Boston.

60 State Street is a modern skyscraper in the Government Center neighborhood of Boston, Massachusetts. Completed in 1977, it is Boston’s 13th tallest building, standing 509 feet (155 m) tall, and housing 38 floors. The Berkeley Building (also known as the Old John Hancock Building) is a 36-story, 495-foot (151 m) structure located at 200 Berkeley Street, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

One International Place is the tallest building in Boston constructed in the 1980s. It is Boston’s fifth-tallest building, standing 600 feet (183 m) tall and housing 46 floors. The building is very prominent in the city’s skyline, particularly when viewed from Boston Harbor.

I think I have provided good information about some of the tallest structures in Boston. This information will be helpful to everyone- be it a visitor or the resident of Boston!

About the Author

To read more about Laugh All Time visit Laugh All Time Learn more about Geek Fun

Did John Hancock have a british accent?

I was doing an Oral report where I had to talk about John Hancock as if I was him and I was wondering if he had a British accent.

Short answer: what Hancock spoke would doubtless have sounded more like English accents in certain parts of England in HIS day, because it had descended from them (in the previous century), though the language in England was entering a period of rapid change.
___________________

The answer to your question depends on what you have in mind by an “English accent”. If you’re thinking of something like the 20th century British “Received Pronunciation”, the question is, did ANYONE in Washington’s day speak that way?!

Start by noting two simple facts:

1) there never was ONE variety of English spoken in England. (In fact, England of the 17th century and of today has more dialects, with more variations, than ALL the dialects of ALL its former colonies!)

2) NO ONE –British or American– speaks the same English as was spoken in the colonial period! Both have changed significantly (including what LATER became the “Received Pronunciation” based on a politically dominant London-area dialect). Several features we associate with this dominant “English accent” today did not even exist at the time the colonies were founded!

So, whatever era you’re looking at, comparing “American English” and “British English” is not a simple matter.

Now about the type of English spoken in the American colonies –

During the colonial period (1607-1775) there for FOUR main migrations of English speaking people to America from the British Isles. These resulted in four main dialect areas, each based on the dialect of the area of the British Isles from which most of its early settlers (“founders”) came. In fact, many of the distinctive features of English in the different regions of the U.S. today can be traced to these.

Thus the English of the American colonists was based on VARIOUS dialects of 17th century BRITISH English. Of course, since they all spoke a LIVING language, BOTH American dialects and British dialects continued to change. Already by the time of the American Revolution there were significant changes had taken place on BOTH sides of the Atlantic. Note that in some cases some British dialects might preserve older patterns (words, accent, etc) and the colonists might innovate; but in other instances older forms would be preserved in AMERICAN dialects, while the British innovated (so the criticism from the British, “you changed our language” is quite uninformed)

summary of the linguistic features of the four regions

http://pandora.cii.wwu.edu/vajda/ling201/test3materials/AmericanDialects.htm

Be Sociable, Share!

•